This workshop focuses on Islamophobia (or anti-Muslim sentiment) or the prejudice against, hatred towards, or fear of the religion of Islam or Muslims.
Guesst Speaker Bio’s: Click Here
March 13, 2016
Justin Trudeau intends to admit 300,000 immigrants into Canada in 2016 — the largest amount ever admitted in a single year. These will not be skilled foreign workers, either. Many will be immigrants’ spouses and other relatives, or simply economic migrants.
Despite how both parties try to sell us immigration by saying it’s either good for the economy or good for diversity, with our current system the taxpayer almost always loses. This Fraser Institute study lays out the facts.
Canada needs a better selection process if we want migration to have a positive impact on Canadians and our economy.
We’ve become a country hell-bent on helping foreigners instead of helping our own citizens.
I want my tax dollars going towards making Canada a better place to live, and helping other Canadians.
Unfortunately that is not the case under our pathologically altruistic government.
The national group RISE CANADA released this ad outlining Liberal leader Justin Trudeau’s notorious Islamic links and policies.
UPDATE: Watch the shorter, 90-second version of our undercover video here, with the highlights. (PS: It’s perfect for sharing.)
We sent a reporter to attempt to vote while wearing a full, face-obscuring niqab.
We sent David Menzies, a six-foot tall man. We gave him three instructions:
1. Don’t take off the niqab;
2. Don’t lie or try to trick anyone; and
3. Keep his undercover camera rolling, no matter what.
What do you think happened? What do you think Elections Canada officials said to David? What do you think they did to determine his real identity? Watch our full-length report:
If you’re as appalled as we are, SIGN THE PETITION demanding that Elections Canada ban wearing a niqab or any other face mask while voting.
It’s one thing to insult Canadian culture by degrading women. It’s just insane to let people vote without showing their face. Please forward this to all of your friends and ask them to sign the petition.
At Yonge and Dundas in downtown Toronto, Ron Banerjee of the Canadian Hindu Advocacy and a couple of friends promote Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party, while chanting about barbaric Islamic cultural practices that must end in Canada.
He and others have been doing this for a week now and will be active through til the election date Oct 19th.
Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fb0_1444522660#RmCZOLG2JG0xKMGo.99
August 8, Montreal
A gaggle of feminists with male satellites in tow flocked to Bethune Square in Montreal to manifest against rape culture and peripherally the presence of Roosh V in the city.
The assumption here, for any reasonable person hearing the term rape culture for the first time, is that these women are raising awareness towards sexual violence, which would be more than laudable. Unfortunately, this is very much not the case as it was explained by the first speaker.
During the opening remarks, rape was defined as employment discrimination, racism, intolerance, emotional aggression and another half dozen or so social issues not even remotely related to forceful sexual intercourse. Apparently, third-wave feminists have openly appropriated this horrific word and redefined the crime of rape to include any emotional (but especially female) feelings of powerlessness.
In their view, the term rape is transposed to mean something violent on a purely meta-linguistic level, a sort of brutally poetic description of catching a man peeking at a woman’s cleavage for instance.
However, the common definition of rape is not terribly ambiguous. These girls are using the word because it instantly elicits sympathy. Absolutely nobody but a sociopath would “support” a rape culture, and they hedge on this fact to gather crowds. Their crusade against “rape culture” oversimplifies the world of sexual dynamics, trying to expand the notion of actual rape to other types of interaction (kissing, touching, etc.).
Two ineloquent keynote speakers went on to talk about consent, which they did not even attempt to clearly define. This is consistent with their very overt and awkward attempts to swim in a linguistic morass of victim buzzwords and hazy concepts. Since they have desexualized the term rape, then what is the definition of consent and how does one “obtain” it? No clear answer was given.